Clinical success of implant-supported and tooth-implant-supported double crown-retained dentures.
Identifieur interne : 003393 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 003392; suivant : 003394Clinical success of implant-supported and tooth-implant-supported double crown-retained dentures.
Auteurs : Gunda Bernhart [Allemagne] ; Andreas Koob ; Marc Schmitter ; Olaf Gabbert ; Thomas Stober ; Peter RammelsbergSource :
- Clinical oral investigations [ 1436-3771 ] ; 2012.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Cimentation, Conception d'implant dentaire et de pilier, Couronnes, Dent artificielle, Dentisterie esthétique, Femelle, Humains, Mâchoire partiellement édentée (), Mâchoire partiellement édentée (rééducation et réadaptation), Mâchoire édentée (), Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation), Mâle, Overdenture, Perte dentaire (étiologie), Piliers dentaires, Propriétés de surface, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Péri-implantite (étiologie), Résultat thérapeutique, Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire, Satisfaction du patient, Sujet âgé, Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus, Échec de restauration dentaire, Études de cohortes, Études de suivi, Études rétrospectives.
- MESH :
- rééducation et réadaptation : Mâchoire partiellement édentée, Mâchoire édentée.
- étiologie : Perte dentaire, Péri-implantite.
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Cimentation, Conception d'implant dentaire et de pilier, Couronnes, Dent artificielle, Dentisterie esthétique, Femelle, Humains, Mâchoire partiellement édentée, Mâchoire édentée, Mâle, Overdenture, Piliers dentaires, Propriétés de surface, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Résultat thérapeutique, Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire, Satisfaction du patient, Sujet âgé, Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus, Échec de restauration dentaire, Études de cohortes, Études de suivi, Études rétrospectives.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cementation, Cohort Studies, Crowns, Dental Abutments, Dental Implant-Abutment Design, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Denture Retention, Denture, Overlay, Esthetics, Dental, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Jaw, Edentulous (surgery), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery), Male, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Peri-Implantitis (etiology), Retrospective Studies, Surface Properties, Tooth Loss (etiology), Tooth, Artificial, Treatment Outcome.
- MESH :
- etiology : Peri-Implantitis, Tooth Loss.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cementation, Cohort Studies, Crowns, Dental Abutments, Dental Implant-Abutment Design, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Denture Retention, Denture, Overlay, Esthetics, Dental, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Retrospective Studies, Surface Properties, Tooth, Artificial, Treatment Outcome.
Abstract
The objective of this retrospective study was to compare biological and technical complications of implant-supported and tooth-implant-supported double crown-retained dentures (DCRDs) with those of tooth-supported DCRDs. Sixty-three DCRDs were monitored. One study group included 16 prostheses with a combination of implants and natural teeth as double crowns (ti group), whereas in the second study group, 19 dentures were retained exclusively on implants (ii group); a third study group with 28 exclusively tooth-supported dentures served as controls (tt group). Tooth loss, implant failure, and technical complications (loss of retention of primary crown, abutment screw loosening, loss of facing, fracture of resin denture teeth and fracture of saddle resin) were analysed. During the observation period of 24 months, no implants or teeth were lost in the ti group and three technical complications were recorded. In the ii group, two implants were lost, two cases of peri-implantitis occurred and four technical complications were observed. In the tt group, two cases of tooth loss and seven technical complications were observed. At the time of the last examination, all prostheses of the ti group and the ii group were functional. Patients of these two study groups reported high satisfaction with both function and aesthetics with no significant difference between the two groups. Treatment with DCRDs showed comparable results in the three study groups. The 2-year results indicate that double crowns can be recommended for implant and combined tooth-implant-retained dentures.
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-011-0592-1
PubMed: 21789591
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: 000F97
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: 000F97
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: 000F97
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: 003785
- to stream Ncbi, to step Curation: 003785
- to stream Ncbi, to step Checkpoint: 003785
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 003410
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 003393
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Clinical success of implant-supported and tooth-implant-supported double crown-retained dentures.</title><author><name sortKey="Bernhart, Gunda" sort="Bernhart, Gunda" uniqKey="Bernhart G" first="Gunda" last="Bernhart">Gunda Bernhart</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik, Universitätsklinik für Mund-, Zahn- und Kieferkrankheiten, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. gunda.bernhart@med.uni-heidelberg.de</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik, Universitätsklinik für Mund-, Zahn- und Kieferkrankheiten, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="land" nuts="1">Bade-Wurtemberg</region><region type="district" nuts="2">District de Karlsruhe</region><settlement type="city">Heidelberg</settlement></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Koob, Andreas" sort="Koob, Andreas" uniqKey="Koob A" first="Andreas" last="Koob">Andreas Koob</name></author><author><name sortKey="Schmitter, Marc" sort="Schmitter, Marc" uniqKey="Schmitter M" first="Marc" last="Schmitter">Marc Schmitter</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gabbert, Olaf" sort="Gabbert, Olaf" uniqKey="Gabbert O" first="Olaf" last="Gabbert">Olaf Gabbert</name></author><author><name sortKey="Stober, Thomas" sort="Stober, Thomas" uniqKey="Stober T" first="Thomas" last="Stober">Thomas Stober</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rammelsberg, Peter" sort="Rammelsberg, Peter" uniqKey="Rammelsberg P" first="Peter" last="Rammelsberg">Peter Rammelsberg</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2012">2012</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:21789591</idno><idno type="pmid">21789591</idno><idno type="doi">10.1007/s00784-011-0592-1</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000F97</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000F97</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000F97</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000F97</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000F97</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">000F97</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">003785</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">003785</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">003785</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">003410</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">003393</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">003393</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Clinical success of implant-supported and tooth-implant-supported double crown-retained dentures.</title><author><name sortKey="Bernhart, Gunda" sort="Bernhart, Gunda" uniqKey="Bernhart G" first="Gunda" last="Bernhart">Gunda Bernhart</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik, Universitätsklinik für Mund-, Zahn- und Kieferkrankheiten, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. gunda.bernhart@med.uni-heidelberg.de</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik, Universitätsklinik für Mund-, Zahn- und Kieferkrankheiten, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="land" nuts="1">Bade-Wurtemberg</region><region type="district" nuts="2">District de Karlsruhe</region><settlement type="city">Heidelberg</settlement></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Koob, Andreas" sort="Koob, Andreas" uniqKey="Koob A" first="Andreas" last="Koob">Andreas Koob</name></author><author><name sortKey="Schmitter, Marc" sort="Schmitter, Marc" uniqKey="Schmitter M" first="Marc" last="Schmitter">Marc Schmitter</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gabbert, Olaf" sort="Gabbert, Olaf" uniqKey="Gabbert O" first="Olaf" last="Gabbert">Olaf Gabbert</name></author><author><name sortKey="Stober, Thomas" sort="Stober, Thomas" uniqKey="Stober T" first="Thomas" last="Stober">Thomas Stober</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rammelsberg, Peter" sort="Rammelsberg, Peter" uniqKey="Rammelsberg P" first="Peter" last="Rammelsberg">Peter Rammelsberg</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Clinical oral investigations</title><idno type="eISSN">1436-3771</idno><imprint><date when="2012" type="published">2012</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Cementation</term><term>Cohort Studies</term><term>Crowns</term><term>Dental Abutments</term><term>Dental Implant-Abutment Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Denture Retention</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Esthetics, Dental</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery)</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Peri-Implantitis (etiology)</term><term>Retrospective Studies</term><term>Surface Properties</term><term>Tooth Loss (etiology)</term><term>Tooth, Artificial</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Cimentation</term><term>Conception d'implant dentaire et de pilier</term><term>Couronnes</term><term>Dent artificielle</term><term>Dentisterie esthétique</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée ()</term><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term><term>Mâchoire édentée ()</term><term>Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Perte dentaire (étiologie)</term><term>Piliers dentaires</term><term>Propriétés de surface</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Péri-implantite (étiologie)</term><term>Résultat thérapeutique</term><term>Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Satisfaction du patient</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus</term><term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term><term>Études de cohortes</term><term>Études de suivi</term><term>Études rétrospectives</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="etiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Peri-Implantitis</term><term>Tooth Loss</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term><term>Mâchoire édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="étiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Perte dentaire</term><term>Péri-implantite</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Cementation</term><term>Cohort Studies</term><term>Crowns</term><term>Dental Abutments</term><term>Dental Implant-Abutment Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Denture Retention</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Esthetics, Dental</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Retrospective Studies</term><term>Surface Properties</term><term>Tooth, Artificial</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Cimentation</term><term>Conception d'implant dentaire et de pilier</term><term>Couronnes</term><term>Dent artificielle</term><term>Dentisterie esthétique</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term><term>Mâchoire édentée</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Piliers dentaires</term><term>Propriétés de surface</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Résultat thérapeutique</term><term>Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Satisfaction du patient</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus</term><term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term><term>Études de cohortes</term><term>Études de suivi</term><term>Études rétrospectives</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The objective of this retrospective study was to compare biological and technical complications of implant-supported and tooth-implant-supported double crown-retained dentures (DCRDs) with those of tooth-supported DCRDs. Sixty-three DCRDs were monitored. One study group included 16 prostheses with a combination of implants and natural teeth as double crowns (ti group), whereas in the second study group, 19 dentures were retained exclusively on implants (ii group); a third study group with 28 exclusively tooth-supported dentures served as controls (tt group). Tooth loss, implant failure, and technical complications (loss of retention of primary crown, abutment screw loosening, loss of facing, fracture of resin denture teeth and fracture of saddle resin) were analysed. During the observation period of 24 months, no implants or teeth were lost in the ti group and three technical complications were recorded. In the ii group, two implants were lost, two cases of peri-implantitis occurred and four technical complications were observed. In the tt group, two cases of tooth loss and seven technical complications were observed. At the time of the last examination, all prostheses of the ti group and the ii group were functional. Patients of these two study groups reported high satisfaction with both function and aesthetics with no significant difference between the two groups. Treatment with DCRDs showed comparable results in the three study groups. The 2-year results indicate that double crowns can be recommended for implant and combined tooth-implant-retained dentures.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Allemagne</li></country><region><li>Bade-Wurtemberg</li><li>District de Karlsruhe</li></region><settlement><li>Heidelberg</li></settlement></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Gabbert, Olaf" sort="Gabbert, Olaf" uniqKey="Gabbert O" first="Olaf" last="Gabbert">Olaf Gabbert</name><name sortKey="Koob, Andreas" sort="Koob, Andreas" uniqKey="Koob A" first="Andreas" last="Koob">Andreas Koob</name><name sortKey="Rammelsberg, Peter" sort="Rammelsberg, Peter" uniqKey="Rammelsberg P" first="Peter" last="Rammelsberg">Peter Rammelsberg</name><name sortKey="Schmitter, Marc" sort="Schmitter, Marc" uniqKey="Schmitter M" first="Marc" last="Schmitter">Marc Schmitter</name><name sortKey="Stober, Thomas" sort="Stober, Thomas" uniqKey="Stober T" first="Thomas" last="Stober">Thomas Stober</name></noCountry><country name="Allemagne"><region name="Bade-Wurtemberg"><name sortKey="Bernhart, Gunda" sort="Bernhart, Gunda" uniqKey="Bernhart G" first="Gunda" last="Bernhart">Gunda Bernhart</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003393 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 003393 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:21789591
|texte= Clinical success of implant-supported and tooth-implant-supported double crown-retained dentures.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:21789591" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |